EURC price

The stablecoin market has evolved over the past 12 months. Recent findings from payment platform Bridge show that stablecoin transaction volume has reached record highs, surpassing $2.5 trillion. Data from Bridge also shows that the total stablecoin supply has reached an all-time high in the past few months, driven primarily by the growth of Tether’s USDT. Additional findings from Chainalysis’s 2025 Global Adoption Index report note that between June 2024 and June 2025, USDT processed over $1 trillion per month, peaking at $1.14 trillion in January 2025. Meanwhile, Circle’s USDC ranged from $1.24 to $3.29 trillion monthly, with particularly high activity in October last year. The Chainalysis 2025 Global Cryptocurrency Adoption Index is L I V E! Here’s a snapshot of what we found: APAC is emerging as the fastest-growing region Eastern Europe countries dominate the index, when adjusted for population Stablecoins are surging globally for a… pic.twitter.com/XGdbscCq48— Chainalysis (@chainalysis) September 3, 2025 Stablecoin Market Fragmented, But Growth Remains Strong According to Chainalysis, these volumes show the continued centrality of Tether and USDC in crypto market infrastructure. Yet hundreds of other stablecoins are also being leveraged daily. This suggests that while today’s stablecoin ecosystem is expanding, fragmentation remains across the sector. Chainalysis chief economist Kim Grauer told Cryptonews that this divergence may also indicate a shift in how stablecoins are being used. “USDC’s growth appears closely linked to U.S.-based institutional rails and regulated corridors, while EURC’s rise suggests growing interest in euro-denominated digital assets, possibly driven by MiCA-compliant platforms and European fintech adoption,” Grauer said. Source: Chainalysis Expanding on this, Reeve Collins, chairman of stablecoin protocol STBL.com, told Cryptonews that USDT appears to be dominant in emerging markets where it acts as digital cash to provide access to U.S. Dollars. He added that PYUSD uses PayPal’s reach to normalize stablecoins in everyday payments, though adoption remains small. At the time of writing, CoinMarketCap shows that the market capitalization of PYUSD is $1.18 billion. “In this space, liquidity and utility outweigh brand recognition, which is why USDT and USDC continue to lead for now,” Collins said. Interestingly, findings from Chainalysis show that smaller stablecoins like EURC, PYUSD, and MakerDAO’s DAI have experienced rapid growth. The index report shows how EURC grew nearly 89% month-over-month on average, with monthly volume rising from approximately $47 million in June 2024 to over $7.5 billion by June 2025. Findings also show that PYUSD sustained acceleration, rising from around $783 million to $3.95 billion in the same period. Source: Chainalysis Stablecoins For Institutions While rapid growth has become apparent across popular stablecoins, additional use cases are further driving adoption. For example, a Ripple spokesperson told Cryptonews that Ripple USD (RLUSD) is an enterprise-grade stablecoin, designed with regulatory compliance, utility, and transparency. “Unlike stablecoins geared primarily toward retail users, RLUSD has been purpose-built for enterprise utility,” they said. According to Ripple, common use cases for RLUSD include facilitating the instant settlement of cross-border payments, providing liquidity for remittance and treasury operations, seamlessly integrating with decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, and bridging between traditional fiat currencies and the crypto ecosystem to ensure an efficient transition when on-ramping/off-ramping in crypto. These use cases are important, especially as stablecoins move beyond crypto-native trading tools to mainstream financial infrastructure. This already appears to be the case, as there has been a rise in institutional activity around stablecoins recently. Chainalysis’s index report notes that Stripe, Mastercard, and Visa have all launched products allowing users to spend stablecoins via traditional rails. Platforms like MetaMask, Kraken, and Crypto.com have recently introduced card-linked stablecoin payments. At the same time, traditional financial institutions such as Citi and Bank of America are expanding their offerings and may even launch their own stablecoins soon. Stablecoins For Payments Another interesting use case for stablecoins centers around retail and merchant payments. According to Chainalysis, PYUSD’s recent growth could point to a broader appetite for alternative, highly regulated stablecoins in retail and payment contexts. Also on the merchant side, partnerships between Circle, Paxos, and companies like Nuvei plan to streamline settlement in stablecoins. This isn’t only impacting the U.S. Dr. Sangmin Seo, chairman of Kaia DLT Foundation, told Cryptonews that in regions like Korea, stablecoins for retail payments are quickly gaining traction. “Stablecoin users can purchase merchandise by using tap-to-pay or online stablecoin-enabled payment solutions in Korea,” Dr. Seo said. He further explained that Kaia’s USDT stablecoin has become the main digital currency for the mini decentralized application (dApp) ecosystem within LINE Messenger, a popular messaging app in Asia. “When users enjoy Dapps on their every day messaging app which dominates markets in Japan, Taiwan, and Thailand, they can use Kaia USDT for payments. Kaia USDT is now also available in Visa-enabled tap-to-pay, Oobit, in South Korea, Thailand, and the Philippines. You can travel with the Oobit app to enjoy shopping in these Asian countries.” Although stablecoin growth is accelerating in different areas, a number of challenges may slow adoption. For instance, Grauer explained that stablecoin usage remains partly discouraged by traditional financial players and regulators who are still more cautious about digital assets more broadly. From a user’s perspective, Grauer thinks that the technology remains partly complex and potentially too intimidating at this point for mainstream adoption. However, as regulatory frameworks mature globally, Grauer is confident that stablecoins will move from a niche financial tool to mainstream financial infrastructure with real-world utility. “The potential is immense, and unlocking this next phase of digital financial innovation can be best achieved with increased regulatory clarity, enhanced user experience, and industry collaboration,” she commented. As for the future of stablecoins, Collins noted that growth is just one piece of the puzzle. “We’re entering Stablecoins 2.0—The first wave digitized dollars, the next wave financializes them. Stablecoins won’t just be passive payment tokens; they’ll unlock yield, governance, and programmability,” Collins said. In order to achieve this, Collins said that a key shift will be to separate principal from yield, so that stablecoin users can spend the dollar while still capturing an income stream. “The challenge, and the opportunity, is to build this in full alignment with emerging stablecoin regulations,” he said.

Yiwu and USDT, these two seemingly unrelated terms, are now being put into the same context. As the "World Small Commodity Capital", in the past, Yiwu merchants often had to go through layers of correspondent bank transfers to sell goods to the Middle East, Latin America and Africa, which not only took a long time and cost high, but also often encountered the risk of capital retention. In recent years, the situation is quietly changing, according to Huatai Securities Research Report, in Yiwu, stablecoins have become one of the important tools for cross-border payments, buyers only need to complete the transfer on their mobile phones, and the funds can arrive in a few minutes, Chainalysis estimates that as early as 2023, the flow of stablecoins on the Yiwu market chain has exceeded 10 billion US dollars. Although the 21st Century Business Herald's follow-up survey pointed out that most merchants in Yiwu have not heard of or understand stablecoins, and only a few merchants support stablecoin payments, this just shows that it is still in its early stages and has shown a trend of proliferation. In other words, stablecoins are becoming the "new dollar" for small and micro traders around the world to receive cross-border payments - payment, which is not only the starting point of stablecoins, but also the most direct incision for them to enter the global financial system. From "Payment" to "Global Payment" Since the development of stablecoins, the application scenarios have diversified: some people use it to participate in DeFi mining, some people use it to earn interest, and some people use it as collateral assets. But behind these uses, payments are always the core function. Especially in the cross-border payment scenario, "global payment" is a scene where stablecoins contrast with traditional finance. As we all know, the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) system has long been the core pillar of cross-border transactions, but its inefficiencies are unsustainable in modern financial needs - a cross-border remittance often goes through multiple correspondent banks, cumbersome procedures, slow settlement, and can take days to complete, during which the transaction costs remain high due to layers of fees. For businesses that rely on cash flow, or individual users who need to send money home, these delays and costs are almost unbearable. To put it bluntly, while SWIFT still has a global reach, it is not designed for the efficient needs of the digital economy. In this context, stablecoins offer a fast, low-cost, and borderless alternative path. They naturally have the attributes of low cost, borderless, and real-time arrival, and a cross-border transfer can be completed in just a few minutes without layers of agents, and the handling fee is also significantly reduced due to network differences. For example, the current transfer of stablecoins such as USDT/USDC on the mainstream Ethereum L2 network has dropped to a few cents and can be almost ignored, which makes stablecoins naturally a viable solution for "global payments", especially in Southeast Asia, Latin America and other regions where cross-border funds are active and traditional channels are not smooth, gradually becoming the mainstream choice for micropayments. More importantly, for underdeveloped and even turbulent economic and social development, stablecoins are not just "payment tools", they also function as short-term stores of value - in the eyes of these users who are at risk of depreciation of their local currency, holding stablecoins means more stable purchasing power protection. This dual role of "payment + hedging" is the reason why "global payment stablecoins" are worth discussing separately. Source: imToken Web (web.token.im)'s "global payment" (remittance) stablecoin From the perspective of imToken, stablecoins are no longer a tool that can be summarized in a single narrative, but a multi-dimensional "asset aggregation" - different users and different needs will correspond to different stablecoin choices. In this category, "global payment stablecoins" (USDT, USDC, FDUSD, TUSD, EURC, etc.) are a separate category dedicated to cross-border transfers and value circulation, and their role is becoming clearer: they are both the fast lane of global capital flows and the "new dollar" for users in volatile markets. Why can't the global system avoid stablecoins? If "payment" is the original intention of stablecoins, then "global payment" is their most competitive landing scenario. The reason is simple: stablecoins almost naturally fit into the three major pain points of cross-border payments - cost, efficiency and acceptability. First of all, for payment scenarios, cost and efficiency are the core. As mentioned above, traditional cross-border remittances often need to go through multiple correspondent banks, which can take "days" and cost tens of dollars. In contrast, the advantages of stablecoins are clear at a glance, with a single transfer fee of far less than $1 on the Ethereum L2 network, which has become a common tool for cross-border micropayments in Southeast Asia, Latin America, and other places. According to Keyrock, the fee for cross-border remittances of $200 from traditional banks is about 12.66%, MTOs (remittance operators) are about 5.35%, and mobile operators are about 3.87%, while stablecoin platforms can reduce the cost of similar transfers to less than 1%, greatly improving the efficiency of capital flow Not at all on an order of magnitude. Source: Keyrock Secondly, in addition to efficiency and cost, whether the payment can be widely adopted depends on whether the other party is willing to accept it. This is due to the mutual fulfillment of the crypto market and stablecoins over the years - USDT, as the world's largest stablecoin, has a long-term stable market value at the level of 100 billion US dollars, and is the most widely accepted payment medium. Under the continuous penetration, in countries such as Turkey, Argentina, and Nigeria that have severely depreciated their local currencies, USDT has almost become a de facto "savings currency"; USDC attracts institutions with transparent reserves and compliance, and has high penetration in the European and American markets. EURC, although smaller, has an irreplaceable role in cross-border settlements in the European region. Finally, speed and cost are important for payments, but whether the funds are really safe is even more critical. With the implementation of the GENIUS Act in the United States, the implementation of the Stablecoin Ordinance in Hong Kong, and the successive pilots in markets such as Japan and South Korea, compliance issuance has gradually become a "passport" for stablecoins. In the future, stablecoins that can enter the global payment system will most likely be "whitelisted players" on the path to compliance (read more "Gray Behemoth vs. Whitelist Players: A Perspective on the "Fork Moment" brought about by compliant stablecoins). In summary, the reason why stablecoins are becoming the infrastructure for "global payments" is not accidental, but because they have formed an alternative advantage to traditional cross-border payments in terms of efficiency, cost, acceptance, and transparency. Payments are the starting point and a bigger future Because of this, for stablecoins, which have gradually expanded their "global payment" attributes, they are far more than just the transaction needs of Crypto native users, but extend to a wider range of groups: Individuals and businesses with cross-border remittance or payment needs; Crypto traders who need to quickly transfer funds between different exchanges; Users facing the depreciation of their home currency and seeking safe haven against stable assets such as US dollars or euros; From this perspective, "global payments" are not only the original intention of stablecoins, but also their most realistic and urgent landing scenario - they are not intended to overthrow the traditional banking system, but provide a more efficient, lower-cost, and more inclusive supplementary solution, turning cross-border settlements that used to require multiple correspondent banks and arrive in days into an action that can be completed in "minutes + cents". With the implementation of the GENIUS Act in the United States, the entry into force of the Stablecoin Ordinance in Hong Kong, and the launch of pilots in markets such as Japan and South Korea, global payment stablecoins will become an indispensable part of the financial system, whether it is cross-border payments, corporate treasuries, or personal hedging. When we look back at the experimental attempt of Yiwu merchants to collect USDT, we may find that this is not a story of a city, but a global microcosm - stablecoins are moving from the edge to the mainstream, from the chain to reality, and eventually become a new infrastructure for global value flow. From this perspective, payments are the starting point of stablecoins and their larger future towards global financial infrastructure.