Arch Network kommer til å endre hele oppfatningen av BTC Infra kommer til å legge ut mye om økosystemet og mulighetene etter hvert som de dukker opp Sjekk ut denne flotte artikkelen fra @ahboyash for å forstå spenningen
After the whole Bitcoin L2 + Ordinals/runes hype, seems like a lull period in terms of exciting Bitcoin innovation Two projects that are still building which caught my eye • @ArchNtwrk: Bitcoin-native execution layer that delivers fast, composable, bridge-free smart contracts while anchoring security and settlement to Bitcoin itself • @citrea_xyz: the first zk-rollup fully secured by Bitcoin, unlocking a programmable layer for native BTC applications without compromising Bitcoin’s security - - - - - 1. Arch Network a) Intro • Bitcoin-native execution layer: computation layer that works directly with Bitcoin’s security model, rather than a rollup/bridge-based L2 • Bridge-free programmability: Solves the core problem that L2s have which is silo liquidity and can’t interoperate; Arch’s goal is a trust-minimized execution without bridging assets off Bitcoin • Taproot-compatible accounts + existing wallets: can use any Xverse or Magic Eden wallets with no need for bridging tokens • Benefits: Solana-like UX with Bitcoin finality b) Tech architecture • UTXO-aware VM (eBPF) + custom syscalls: Lets programs execute complex financial logic while interoperating with real Bitcoin UTXOs • Programs: Core primitives for writing apps, with a full developer toolchain (CLI, explorer, RPC) • Network roles: Bootnode (discovery), Leader (coordination), Validators (program execution), plus tight Bitcoin node/RPC integration • FROST + ROAST threshold signatures: A decentralized validator network signs state transitions; design emphasizes permissionless PoS-style validator sets and gradual decentralization as the number of signers grow • Traction: Featured apps include Saturn (DEX), funkybit (memecoin launchpad), ChaChing (borrow/lend); testnet shows 346k wallets and 2M+ txs This solves Bitcoin’s dilemma where L1 dApps are secure but slow and non-composable; L2s are fast but fragment liquidity and require bridges. Arch proposes a middle playing field: fast, composable UX that anchors to L1 and avoids bridge risk 2. Citrea a) Intro • Execution layer: The first zk-rollup fully secured by Bitcoin, transforming Bitcoin into a programmable platform for applications (called “₿apps” that consists of DeFi and consumer apps), while maintaining Bitcoin’s security, decentralization, and censorship resistance • The mission: unlike wBTC or centralized custodians, Citrea keeps native BTC on-chain and leverages trust-minimized bridging via their Clementine bridge. This stops the “value drain” of BTC to CEXes or other centralised chains and unlocks full potential of Bitcoin as a base layer for finance, gaming and payments b) Tech architecture • zk-Rollup on Bitcoin: executes tx off-chain (periodic checkpoints to Bitcoin) + zk-STARKS for state validity • Bitcoin as Data Availability: leverages Bitcoin for settlement and data availability (all state transitions are provable and reconstructible from Bitcoin inscriptions + Citrea inherits Bitcoin’s chain finality guarantees) • Clementine Bridge: trust-minimized 2-way peg bridge, optimicsic verification of withdrawals and supports single-round fraud proofs for fast dispute resolution • ₿apps (Bitcoin Applications): non-custodial apps using Bitcoin such as DeFi, payments, Gaming and NFTs The importance of Citrea is how it retains liquidity and expands Bitcoin’s role in global finance Developers are provided with a familiar environment (EVM tooling) with Bitcoin-level security guarantees while users enjoy the benefit of eliminated custodial risks to unlock their native BTC in DeFi and other applications - - - - - Closing thoughts Citrea is taking a bet on a modularity approach (zk-rollup anchored to Bitcoin to bring EVM-style tooling, liquidity, and composability); while Arch takes the Bitcoin-native route with a UTXO-aware eBPF VM, FROST/ROAST multisig, Taproot-wallet UX, and optional pre-confirmations. In short, builders/users would choose Citrea for EVM-aligned scale and interoperability, and Arch Network for a more pure-Bitcoin UX with direct settlement --> both are likely to coexist as complementary rails in a BTC-denominated economy
Vis originalen
1,6k
0
Innholdet på denne siden er levert av tredjeparter. Med mindre annet er oppgitt, er ikke OKX forfatteren av de siterte artikkelen(e) og krever ingen opphavsrett til materialet. Innholdet er kun gitt for informasjonsformål og representerer ikke synspunktene til OKX. Det er ikke ment å være en anbefaling av noe slag og bør ikke betraktes som investeringsråd eller en oppfordring om å kjøpe eller selge digitale aktiva. I den grad generativ AI brukes til å gi sammendrag eller annen informasjon, kan slikt AI-generert innhold være unøyaktig eller inkonsekvent. Vennligst les den koblede artikkelen for mer detaljer og informasjon. OKX er ikke ansvarlig for innhold som er vert på tredjeparts nettsteder. Beholdning av digitale aktiva, inkludert stablecoins og NFT-er, innebærer en høy grad av risiko og kan svinge mye. Du bør nøye vurdere om handel eller innehav av digitale aktiva passer for deg i lys av din økonomiske tilstand.