The EGLD inflation proposal has been thoroughly dissected by @Justin_Bons with strong technical analysis. From the “hidden tax” of inflation siphoning value from holders to private parties, to the “fake DAO” giving only 40% voting power to stakeholders while 60% is controlled by the foundation this is centralized governance disguised as decentralization, far from true DAOs like $DASH or $XTZ. The builder fund 20% with a unilateral whitelist, the user fund inviting mercenary traders (creating sell pressure), and a “blank check” 10% to the core team all forms of extraction. On top of that, an arbitrary $100M mint for MvX Labs (owned by the founder) clearly breaches $Bitcoin style scarcity principles. Grants of $150M for DAT/ETF without market purchases? That’s essentially endless bribes, destroying L1 neutrality. A 90% revenue share will make $EGLD apps 10x more expensive, push gas prices up, and the tokenomics only deflate with 10x $Ethereum level activity highly unrealistic. The trend today is to reduce inflation, yet $EGLD is regressing. Politically, bundling all changes into one massive proposal is a half-baked move pitched as visionary. Using $Solana as justification is misleading $SOL never did anything like this. Justin’s alternative 2% inflation split 45/45/10 is far healthier and fairer, giving real power to stakeholders without exploitation. $EGLD isn’t stuck because of tech (sharding remains solid), but because leadership is defensive and manipulative. For the community, it’s time to be realistic: this isn’t growth, it’s redistribution to the top of the pyramid. Diversify before the cult mentality digs in deeper.